Finance

France avoid S&P credit downgrade but concerns persist


French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said Europe must ‘flex its muscles’ in the industrial sector – Copyright POOL/AFP PASCAL ROSSIGNOL

Adam PLOWRIGHT and Ali BEKHTAOUI

France managed to avoid a fresh credit downgrade from a leading rating agency on Friday, despite mounting concern over the country’s surging national debt.

Leading ratings agency Fitch in April lowered its rating on France’s debt, which is approaching three trillion euros ($3.2 trillion).

It pointed to the country’s hung parliament and public protests as risks to plans by President Emmanuel Macron to cut government spending.

But influential rival S&P Global on Friday maintained its “AA” rating when it updated its advice, dispelling fears France could face another downgrade over its chronic overspending that last saw a government run a budget surplus in the 1970s.

The agency said the decision to maintain the rating level was “mainly due the government’s revised budgetary consolidation strategy”, as well as recently implemented labour market and pension reforms.

“I take note of Standard & Poor’s decision to leave France’s debt rating unchanged”, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said in an interview with Le Journal du dimanche weekly.

“It’s a positive signal. Our public finance strategy is clear. It is ambitious. And it is credible.”

Macron pushed through a pension reform this year in the face of the biggest demonstrations in a generation, although the proposed savings will be lower than first expected because of concessions made to trade unions and opponents.

S&P warned that the outlook still remained “negative”, saying that “tighter financial conditions and still-high core inflation” would restrain France’s economic activity this year and next.

It also flagged concerns over the lack of a parliamentary majority, making it harder to implement policies.

Macron came to power in 2017 promising to balance France’s books and his first prime minister, Edouard Philippe, memorably told parliament that the country was “dancing on a volcano that is rumbling ever louder”.

But unbudgeted tax cuts during Macron’s first term following the so-called “Yellow Vest” anti-government revolt and the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 have led to a sharp deterioration in the public finances since.

– Credibility questioned –

The country’s debt currently stands at around 111 percent of gross national product (GDP), from just shy of 100 percent before Covid-19 when Macron put in place one of Europe’s most generous social safety nets.

The government has brought the annual public deficit down from a whopping 9.0 percent of GDP in 2020 to a forecast 4.9 percent this year.

Its projections show it falling to below 3.0 percent by 2027 when Macron will leave office. 

But ratings agencies and investors are increasingly concerned about the credibility of the 45-year-old centrist leader whose successful prior career in investment banking once saw him dubbed the “Mozart of finance”.

On top of multi-billion-euro subsidies packages and price controls last year aimed at easing a cost-of-living crisis sparked by the war in Ukraine, Macron has since promised further tax cuts of two billion euros for the middle classes.

Increased defence spending — set to rise 400 billion euros over the next seven years — is a further drag on the public purse.

The public finances “were already in a degraded state before the Covid-19 pandemic, but to our eyes they now call for urgent measures”, the head of the national auditing office, Pierre Moscovici, said in March.

“Reforming the public finances… has to be a national priority,” he argued.

The French central bank has issued similar warnings in milder language.

France has the highest level of public spending relative to the size of its economy of all countries monitored by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, a Paris-based economic institute.

Fitch lowered its rating by one notch on April 28 to “AA-“.

Macron said the agency “was making a profound mistake in its political analysis” in comments to the l’Opinion magazine afterwards. 



Source link

Leave a Response