Collateralized Fund Obligations: Considerations For GPs And LPs – Fund Finance

Executive Summary

Collateralized fund obligations (“CFOs”) have garnered
attention recently, becoming increasingly popular within the fund
finance market as a way to generate liquidity. CFOs have several
benefits, as we explained in a previous Legal Update, but that does not mean they are
not without risks or complications. In this Legal Update, we share
some of the considerations for fund general partners and limited
partners when engaging in a CFO transaction.

Background

Collateralized fund obligations (“CFOs”) have garnered
attention recently as they gain popularity within the fund finance
market as a way to generate liquidity. A fund
sponsor—typically the general partner (“GP”) of a
fund—can bundle various fund interests and raise capital by
using them as collateral without selling the fund interests to
third parties. Limited partner (“LP”) investors are also
attracted to CFOs because the vehicle provides access to a bundled
pool of investments with an enhanced credit rating and can also be
used to manage market volatility in existing portfolios of private
equity exposures.

What GPs and LPs Need to Know

What Are Considerations for GPs?

• Does the transaction’s timing align with the
  required representations? Fund LPs (including the CFO
  Issuer or its subsidiary) must make various representations
  regarding compliance with securities laws, anti-money laundering
  laws, and Know-Your-Client standards. However, CFOs may not have
  the status to make certain of these representations until the CFO
  has issued funded liabilities or has acquired the LP interests, so
  the timing of these representations by the CFO Issuer or its
  subsidiary should be considered to confirm that they are accurate
  when made.




• Are subscription credit facilities involved?
  If the underlying funds do not have subscription lines in place to
  cover capital calls, the GP should consider requiring LPs
  transferring their interests to agree that they will cover any
  defaults of the new LPs to meet capital call obligations. On the
  other hand, if there is a subscription line in place and the
  original LP was part of the fund’s borrowing base, the GP
  should provide the subscription credit lender with sufficient
  advance notice of the transfer to assess any impact on the
  borrowing base.




• Has tax counsel been consulted? Each
  underlying fund’s tax counsel should assess the implications of
  any change of location of the LP holder that may be effected by a
  transfer of the LP interest to the CFO Issuer or its subsidiary, if
  the LP interest is currently held by a different investor.

What Are Considerations for Fund LPs?

• Has the transferring LP obtained the GP’s
  consent? The GP must consent to transfer an LP’s
  interest in the fund. Due to confidentiality provisions in the
  underlying fund, the GP will likely require the LP to sign a
  non-disclosure agreement before consenting. The LP should allow
  ample time to work through any issues with the GP and obtain the
  GP’s consent for the LP to transfer their interest to the CFO
  Issuer.




• Does the CFO transaction’s timing align with the
  underlying fund’s timing requirements? Fund agreements
  often provide that LP interest transfers can only take effect at
  specified times during the year, whether quarterly, bi-annually, or
  annually. The LP should ensure that the timing of the CFO closing
  or portfolio accumulation aligns with these parameters on the
  timing of transfers.




• Has the LP complied with the provisions of the fund
  documentation? To transfer the LP interest to the CFO
  Issuer, the LP must comply with the terms of the fund’s
  governing documents, including tax, securities, anti-money
  laundering, and Know-Your-Client requirements. Accordingly, LPs
  should confirm access to and compliance with these fund
  documents.




• Has the LP considered the costs involved? Each
  transfer of an LP interest will result in legal expenses in
  addition to the cost of the CFO transaction itself. In addition,
  transaction counsel for the various CFO parties will generate legal
  expenses.

Next Steps: What Do We Expect for CFOs?

Investors will continue to be motivated by the higher interest
rates offered by CFO notes over traditional securitizations and the
optimistic returns on equity investments. Investors, funds, and
portfolio companies are all drawn to the enhanced flexibility and
customized options that CFOs offer.

We anticipate that as investors become increasingly comfortable
with these vehicles, CFOs will gain popularity as a source of
liquidity in the fund finance market. For additional information on
CFOs, you can read the following legal updates:

Visit us at
mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising
associated legal practices that are separate entities, including
Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP
(England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and
Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and
non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services
(collectively, the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer
Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be
a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC
(“PKWN”) is the constituent Singapore law practice of our
licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong &
Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and
PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website.
“Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks
of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2023. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights
reserved.

This
Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal
issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a
comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not
intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific
legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters
discussed herein.