The United Kingdom’s recent proactive stance towards the cryptoasset sector is indicative of its commitment to provide clarity, assurance, and protection for both consumers and businesses. With these new regulations slated for implementation earlier this month, the purview spans a vast spectrum of crypto activities, right from trading, and lending, to custody and promotion. However, they also inadvertently weave in a layer of complexity, especially for foreign entities and those yet to be registered, who are vying for a foothold in the UK market.
Central to this regulatory framework is the Payment Services Act (PSA) of 2019, which lays the groundwork for payment service providers, and by extension, entities involved in the realm of cryptoassets. The PSA defines cryptoassets as digital representations of value or rights, which are secured cryptographically and can be transferred and used for investment purposes. It’s pertinent to note that these definitions exclude cryptoassets that squarely fit within the classifications of electronic money or controlled investments already in existence. A further demarcation within the PSA categorizes services as digital payment token (DPT) services and e-money token (EMT) services. The former encompasses platforms, brokers, and those involved in custody and lending, while the latter is predominantly focused on assets that are pegged to a fiat currency or another asset, such as stablecoins.
A salient feature of these regulations is the directive that mandates all DPT service providers to be registered with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The underpinning rationale is anchored in the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (MLRs). These are intricate by design and compel DPT service providers to uphold stringent standards to combat the dual threats of money laundering and terrorist financing. This translates to rigorous customer due diligence, monitoring of transactions, and meticulous record-keeping, especially in scenarios where activities appear suspicious. The mantle of ensuring compliance with the MLRs rests with the FCA.
Expanding the horizon further, there is the inclusion of a financial promotion regime specifically for DPT services. This is orchestrated to integrate the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) within its scope. The FSMA has always been instrumental in regulating the promotion of financial products and services to consumers in the UK, ensuring they are transparent, accurate, and devoid of misleading information. The implications of this integration are multifaceted. It means DPT service providers will now be obligated to provide clear risk warnings, assess the suitability of consumers, instate a cooling-off period, especially for those new to the investment landscape, and disallow certain incentives that might be deemed inappropriate.
Moreover, there are plans to introduce a market abuse regime, which will widen the reach of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) to include DPT service providers. This will scrutinize practices that include but are not limited to, insider trading, manipulation of the market, and unauthorized dissemination of information. This initiative is primarily to clamp down on deceptive activities that encompass tactics like spoofing, front-running, and the notorious pump-and-dump strategies that have plagued many an investor.
In the realm of consumer protection, the introduction of a statutory trust requirement is noteworthy. What this signifies is that by the close of 2023, service providers would need to hold the assets of customers in a trust arrangement. On this front, the FCA is in the process of formulating guidelines.
The landscape, with the advent of these regulations, becomes a double-edged sword for crypto businesses aspiring to set their footprint in the UK market. While clarity is a boon, the challenges are manifold. Non-compliance or even partial adherence could lead to businesses having to restructure their operations, which could span from customer due diligence, and transaction monitoring to rethinking their promotional strategies.
For the consumer, the landscape is both protective and cumbersome. While they will be cushioned by enhanced protective measures, they would also need to wade through increased verification processes and other regulatory protocols.
One of the foremost challenges is the delineation of DPT services. There might be grey areas when it comes to categorizing certain cryptoassets or services under the DPT umbrella. Additionally, challenges on the jurisdictional front arise as the actual enforceability of these regulations on businesses based overseas remains to be seen. Lastly, adaptation by the industry is pivotal. The crypto industry, which has been relatively unbridled, might encounter resistance when adapting to these norms.
The trajectory of the UK’s cryptocurrency regulations, while poised in the right direction, necessitates a harmonious effort from regulators, businesses, and consumers to ensure a seamless transition and integration.
If you’re interested in writing for International Policy Digest – please send us an email via [email protected]
