With addiction centers filling up and problem-gambler hotlines ringing off the hook amid a broader normalization of sports betting, and with an estimated 78% of authorized fraud cases originating online, it’s time to consider whether that “Pay Now” button is a speed ramp that needs some guardrails. That’s what some regulators are preparing to do, indirectly, by rolling out new rules requiring a “cooling off” period for certain crypto trades. It’s an idea worth testing.
Starting Oct. 8, first-time crypto buyers in the UK will have to be offered a 24-hour delay between starting a purchase and completing it, as part of proposed tougher crypto advertising rules that also ban referral bonuses. And the European Union’s flagship crypto rules, due to come into force next year, also include a 14-day “right of withdrawal” (similar to existing rules for other online purchases) for consumers who buy tokens that aren’t backed by specific assets or currencies.
A cool-down period to allow time to stop, think and potentially undo a crypto bet is reminiscent of responsible gambling tools used everywhere from Britain to Australia, and suggests regulators are serious about looking beyond the usual financial toolkit when it comes to crypto’s myriad risks. Despite the sector’s mantra of “Do Your Own Research,” consumer pressure to trade is clearly driven more by FOMO — word of mouth, social media and the loop of rising prices — than any real analysis. Think of Elon Musk’s Dogecoin tweets, or frothy six-figure Bitcoin price targets. A Bank for International Settlements paper recently estimated about three-quarters of retail investors around the world lost money on Bitcoin between 2015 to 2022.
Even if a day of quiet contemplation for a first-time user won’t stop the tide of the crypto-desperate — a tide that’s admittedly been weakened by the reality of brutal market correction — it could make a difference to the most vulnerable. One 2022 study surveying the impact of 60-minute play breaks on British online gamblers found that it appeared to prevent overspending: 41% of players stopped depositing money and 45% stopped betting for the rest of the day. The authors warned this didn’t seem to change behavior over a longer period of time, though.
And it could be the start of a much-needed ramp-up in oversight when it comes to digital finance’s blurring of the boundary between gambling and investing. Regulators are increasingly looking to the likes of Alphabet Inc. or Microsoft Corp. to help clamp down on the promotion of unauthorized financial firms; banks also want Meta Platforms Inc. to take more responsibility for scams and fraud.
There will doubtless be some pushback from industry players when these rules start to get rolled out, as seen in other products with cool-offs like peer-to-peer lending. But the real risk is mounting resistance from politicians. Tougher proposed crypto regulation in the UK has already clashed with Rishi Sunak’s ambitions to make London a crypto hub, mirroring Emmanuel Macron’s Parisian push, and there seems to be little government interest in the idea of regulating consumer trading of digital assets as a form of gambling. Downing Street also seems keen to cut back on rules that the UK once championed — such as unbundling research from trading. Could the crypto bros find more allies in government circles against regulatory red tape? Don’t bet against it.
More From Bloomberg Opinion:
• Crypto Is a Gamble. Regulating It Shouldn’t Be: Lionel Laurent
• Matt Levine’s Money Stuff: FTX Spent Big on Celebrity
• The Sports Gambling Gold Rush Is Off the Charts: O’Brien & He
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering digital currencies, the European Union and France. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion
