Key Takeaways:
- Patrick Hansen clarifies the European Union’s Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR) targets anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism without directly attacking cryptocurrency, specifically excluding non-custodial wallet providers from its scope.
- The regulation mandates strict KYC and AML procedures for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) like exchanges and brokers, essentially banning anonymous accounts and transactions for custodial services.
- Hansen highlights the AMLR’s impact on the crypto industry within the EU as “extremely limited,” debunking myths of a widespread ban on anonymous crypto wallets and transactions.
Patrick Hansen has recently clarified the real implications of the European Union’s Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR), addressing widespread misconceptions about its impact on anonymous crypto wallets and transactions.
Through an extensive explanation on the X social media platform, Hansen sheds light on the true nature and scope of the AMLR, highlighting its role not as a direct attack on cryptocurrency, but as a comprehensive anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing framework.
🚨JUST IN🚨
Crypto influencers are spreading FUD and fake news on EU crypto regulation.
Europe is not banning anonymous payments. They’re prohibiting payments to wallets operated by providers (hosted wallets).
Those represent CEXes and regulated wallets. So if you’ll want to… pic.twitter.com/LKVDKD4KSB
— DavyCrypto (@Davyegld) March 23, 2024
This regulation affects a broad array of “obliged entities” across both financial and certain non-financial sectors, notably excluding non-custodial wallet providers from its demands.
The AMLR’s primary impact on the crypto industry concerns crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), such as exchanges and brokers, especially those regulated under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework.
These entities are mandated to follow strict know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) procedures, effectively prohibiting anonymous accounts and transactions within custodial crypto services.
This extends to a ban on accounts for privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, aligning with existing international AML standards.
Despite Hansen’s critique of some aspects of the AMLR, he emphasizes that the regulation mainly reiterates pre-existing AML/CFT guidelines for CASPs and other regulated entities, without imposing significantly new limitations on self-custodied wallets, peer-to-peer transfers, or the broader crypto market within the EU.
1/ Yesterday was a prime example of why crypto Twitter (and often crypto media) should not be trusted when it comes to crypto policy. Let’s debunk claims that the EU is banning anonymous crypto transactions or self-custodial wallets.
Here is what’s actually in the EU Anti Money… pic.twitter.com/dsNZQzl9Mx
— Patrick Hansen (@paddi_hansen) March 24, 2024
He argues that the regulation’s effect on the cryptocurrency domain within the union is “extremely limited,” thus debunking the myth of a sweeping ban on anonymous crypto wallets and transactions.
About The Author
