To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
On October 24, 2023, the US federal banking regulators finalized
interagency principles for the effective management and supervision
of climate-related financial risks (the “Climate
Principles”).1 The Climate Principles are targeted
at larger banking organizations and are intended to convey
consistent supervisory expectations regarding how climate-related
financial risks should be managed.
The US federal banking regulators had separately proposed the
Climate Principles in 2021 and 2022.2 The Climate
Principles mostly follow the proposals, with only a few noteworthy
changes.
Importantly, Climate Principles are effective immediately. In
this Legal Update, we review the changes made to the draft Climate
Principles and discuss what the industry may expect next.
Final Climate Principles
As discussed in our Legal Update on the proposal from the OCC, the
Climate Principles outline a high-level framework for the
management of exposures to climate-related financial risks that
draws heavily from the Basel Committee’s proposed (now finalized) principles for climate
risk management and the OCC’s existing Heightened Standards.
However, unlike the 18 clearly defined principles of the Basel Committee’s proposal, the Climate
Principles were divided into two narratives that contain somewhat
disjointed commentaries on climate risk management. This structure
was retained in the final Climate Principles, which contain few
substantive changes and some clarifications from the proposals.
These changes are:
- Applicability. The Climate Principles are
intended for US banking organizations with over $100 billion in
total consolidated assets, including holding companies, banks, and
thrifts. This includes the combined US operations of foreign
banking organizations (“FBOs”), as well as individual US
branches or agencies of FBOs, if they satisfy that threshold.
However, the preamble muddies this bright line by stating that
banking organizations of any size may have material exposures to
climate-related financial risks; implying that even smaller
organizations may need to implement climate risk management
practices. - De-banking Concern. Consistent with recent
public statements in response to concerns around de-banking certain
industries, the final Climate Principles expressly state that they
neither prohibit nor discourage banking organizations from
providing banking services to customers of any specific class or
type, as permitted by law or regulation. Even with this change,
Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman noted her concern that the
likely potential consequence of the Climate Principles will be to
“discourage banks from lending and providing financial
services to certain industries.”3 - Lending. The preamble states that the US
federal banking regulators expect banking organizations to manage
climate-related financial risks in a manner that will allow them to
continue to meet the financial services needs of their
communities—including low-and-moderate income and other
underserved consumers and communities—and to ensure
compliance with fair housing and fair lending laws. The Climate
Principles have been revised to include that banking organizations
should ensure that fair lending monitoring programs review whether
and how the organization’s risk mitigation measures potentially
discriminate against consumers on a prohibited basis, such as race,
color, or national origin. - Roles and Responsibilities. As we saw in the
Federal Reserve’s proposal, the final
Climate Principles clarify the role of the boards of directors in
overseeing the banking organization’s risk-taking activities,
and the role of management in executing the strategic plan and risk
management framework. - Compensation. The final Climate Principles
omit any discussion of compensation practices in relationship to
management of climate-related financial risks. However, the
preamble states that the US federal banking regulators continue to
emphasize that sound compensation programs are important to
promoting sound risk management. - Materiality. In response to concerns that
banking organizations might be required to focus on immaterial
risks, merely because they are climate-related, the final Climate
Principles clarify that organizations should incorporate
climate-related financial risks into their risk management
frameworks where those risks are material.
Next Steps
As with other supervisory guidance, the Climate Principles do
not have the force of law in the United States. Rather, the US
federal banking regulators will use the Climate Principles as a
common set of expectations when supervising the safety and
soundness of banking organizations. This typically is done through
non-public processes, meaning that it is likely to remain unclear
how the regulators resolve inherent tensions and policy judgments,
such as the potential conflict between climate risk management and
lending to targeted communities and industries.
Moreover, two FDIC directors and two Federal Reserve governors
dissented when voting on the final Climate Principles. A common
theme in the FDIC dissents is that climate-related financial risk
is like many other types of risk, and that focusing on it in this
manner will distract regulators and organizations from the core
safety and soundness mandate. Similarly, the FDIC and Federal
Reserve dissents touch on the new focus on ensuring that banking
organizations continue to lend to underserved consumers and
communities, observing that if the Climate Principles are not
intended to change these types of lending decisions to reduce
climate risk, then there is arguably no point in issuing them.
Impacted organizations should consider reviewing their risk
taxonomies to ensure that climate-related financial risks are
included and associated control, monitoring, testing and reporting
activities are updated to reflect the Climate Principles.
Footnotes
1. Press Release, Agencies issue principles for
climate-related financial risk management for large financial
institutions (Oct. 24, 2023), https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20231024b.htm.
The US federal banking regulators consist of the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”), Office
of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), and Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).
2. See our December 21, 2021, March 31, 2022, and December 15, 2022 Legal Updates on these
proposals.
3. Michelle Bowman, Statement on Principles for
Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial
Institutions (Oct. 24, 2023), https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bowman-statement-20231024b.htm.
Visit us at
mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising
associated legal practices that are separate entities, including
Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP
(England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and
Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and
non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services
(collectively, the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer
Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be
a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC
(“PKWN”) is the constituent Singapore law practice of our
licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong &
Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and
PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website.
“Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks
of Mayer Brown.
© Copyright 2023. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights
reserved.
This
Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal
issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a
comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not
intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific
legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters
discussed herein.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Finance and Banking from United States
