Apple Launches ‘Connected Cards’ Using Open Banking In The UK

The upcoming Apple
AAPL
iOS 17.1 developer beta shows the first services for the new iPhone Wallet app powered by the U.K.’s Open Banking API. The Wallet app will now be able to show Brits their account balance (including credit cards) from supported banks (including my principal bank, Barclays) as well as their transaction history. The balances will also be shown online when buying something with Apple Pay, helping users be more financially aware about whether they can responsibly afford the purchase. I liked 9to5.mac’s comment that “International Apple users are used to bemoaning U.S.-only features… However, Apple is launching this feature exclusively in the U.K. due to the existence of an interoperable open banking standard in the country”. They go on to say that “The path to getting a feature like this in other regions, like the U.S., is much less clear”, but I’m not sure I agree with that. I think the path is very clear: U.S. regulators need to mandate open banking.

Tap-To-Pay, Here-To-Stay

To be honest, I had expected the platforms (especially Google
GOOG
and Apple) to move into open banking much sooner, because of the importance of bank data in all kinds of value-added service, so I thought it was rather exciting last year when Apple acquired a UK open banking company, Credit Kudos. I wrote at the time that the company’s move into open banking was significant and I noted that in addition to holding an Account Information Service Provider (AISP) license, Credit Kudos were an FCA-regulated credit reference agency, meaning they had access to both open banking data and credit data from banks. As an AISP they can access individual or SME bank account data (with the customer’s consent, of course) and then feed this data into their tools such as their data classification engine (Lotus), insights engine (Atlas), proprietary risk models, decision engine (Assembly), and other income and identity verification tools to improve decisions around credit. There are some great services there, and that’s even before you factor in what Apple’s artificial intelligence wizards might want to do with such data in the future.

Overall, roughly three in four of 130 million iPhone users have activated Apple Pay, with nearly 56 million U.S. consumers making an in-store payment using Apple Pay in April 2023, accounting for nearly half of iOS users. And in 2021, there were an estimated 25 million Google Pay users, which is forecast to grow by another 10 million users by 2025. Visa
V
recently reported that 1 in 3 Americans use tap-to-pay for purchases, seven times the use from just three years ago. Mastercard
MA
reported that contactless payments globally account for almost two-thirds of all in-person transactions.

Not everyone, it has to be said, is happy with Apple’s Wallet. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published their report into “tap to pay”, which finds that financial services providers can offer applications to facilitate POS payments but “cannot rely on NFC technology on mobile devices using Apple’s iOS operating system.” Similarly the European Union’s competition watchdog last year accused Apple of restricting rivals’ access to its tap-and-go technology, Near-Field Communication (NFC), used for mobile wallets, making it difficult for them to develop rival services on Apple devices.

What they mean is that Apple blocks access to EMV applications, not that it blocks access to all NFC applications or other payment applications: you can use other payment services such as Swish, MobilePay or Payconiq but that is via QR codes. The CFPB and the EU feel that Apple’s rules means that competition is limited and that widely used payment apps such as PayPal
PYPL
, Venmo, and Cash App are not available via convenient contactless connectivity and that consumers must use Apple’s proprietary payment service, Apple Pay.

Banks and others are upset about this because they see it as Apple sitting between them and their customers. Last week Apple was ordered to face a private antitrust lawsuit by payment card issuers accusing the company of thwarting competition for its Apple Pay mobile wallet. The proposed class action is led by credit unions who say that Apple “coerces” people who use its devices into using its own wallet for contactless transactions forcing them to pay at least $1 billion of excess fees.

Never mind the issue of transaction fees though. As we all know, one of the most valuable assets in today’s economy is data. While there may be open banking payment transactions downstream (using the Apple Wallet as a front end to FedNow, for example), the fact is that the data Apple can obtain from bank accounts is worth vastly more than any transaction fees it might extract. Consumers are, by and large, happy using their digital wallets for payments. But the fact is that integration with open banking changes the relationship and moves the digital wallet closer to the epicentre of financial life. Tom Noyes wrote earlier this year about the Apple and Google wallets becoming a centre of trust and a super consumer platform empowering consumer choice and, crucially in my opinion, protecting consumer data.

As to when this feature — known as “Connected Cards” — will be available to American consumers, there is a clue in the fine print in the Wallet app set up, which says that “If you are in the United States, Connected Cards is provided by Apple Processing LLC”. It is unclear when Connected Cards will actually launch in the U.S., or which banks will participate. In the U.K., the feature sits on regulatory foundations that currently do not exist in the U.S.

It’s The Identity, Stupid

Anil John, Technical Director of Silicon Valley Innovation Program at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, commented on that CFPB report calling it “recommended reading” and saying that if you substitute “payments” with “identity” in much of the report, “it gives you a preview and the playbook”. That is, wallets will be used by the techfins to make themselves gatekeepers when it comes to identity related transactions that take place on mobile devices (i.e., pretty much all identity-related transactions). He is of course correct and, as has been obvious for years, when tap-to-pay becomes a subset of a more generalised tap-to-prove infrastructure, those gatekeepers will have significant power.

Back in 2014, in my tongue-in-cheek reminiscences of Money20/20 in Las Vegas that year, I made the same point about Apple, saying through the voice of an alter ego “I don’t fall for your ‘easy payment’ waffle. I know it’s just a trojan horse for your wallet play: loyalty, coupons and — if you have your dastardly way — identity”. Apple are smart, so I’m sure they figured this out long before I did, but it’s all about identity.