USA Today Columnist Shames LIV Golfers For Taking Saudi Money While She Sits On Board Of College That Takes Saudi Money – OutKick
USA Today columnist Christine Brennan did some outstanding hypocrisy about LIV golf on Tuesday.
Brennan wrote a lengthy column about The Masters and her frustration with LIV associated golfers ranking near the top of the final leaderboard.
Her problem with LIV stems from the fact that the tour is backed by Saudi money. And as a result, golfers choosing to associate themselves with the Saudis do not deserve to play well or be shown on television.
There’s just one small problem.
Christine Brennan serves on the Board of Trustees for the University of Toledo. And the University of Toledo has taken around $10 million from … you guessed it, the Saudis.
Whoops!
Christine Brennan’s Hypocrisy Regarding Saudi Arabia Money
From 2020 and into 2021, the University of Toledo received dozens of payments from the country of Saudi Arabia. Many were for $10,000 to $50,000.
But three were for huge sums of money, totaling over $11 million.
While the description of each payment varied, the largest was for tuition payments for Saudi students.
Another is described simply as “Awards for citizens of Saudi Arabia.”
Well that seems problematic for Christine’s criticism of the LIV tour, doesn’t it?
It’s yet another example of the hypocrisy involved for those who rush to target golfers like Phil Mickelson or Brooks Koepka.
Is All Saudi Money Dirty? Or Just Some?
While going after fans for supporting those players, Brennan ignored that she helps guide decision making for a university taking in huge payments from the Saudis.
The same Saudis she makes moral stands against.
It’s fair to say that Brennan’s paycheck doesn’t come directly from the Saudis. But if she was so opposed to Americans having any financial involvement with them, why hasn’t she written columns complaining about Toledo’s own practices?
Could it be that she doesn’t want to jeopardize a cushy board spot by criticizing a common university position?
Brennan acts as if her position is one of shining, inarguable virtue. She’s repeatedly exemplified the “holier-than-thou” attitude with her principled stance against Saudi money.
All while her employer benefits from it.
As always, “do as I say, not as I do” rules the day.